First, how could students misinterpret the rules? If
they do, how will you get them back on track? Second, how many times will the activity
be performed? Is there a purpose in repeating the activity? Will repeated the activity
result in the same outcome? Lastly, are there variations of the activity that will highlight
nuisances of a concept or introduce a more advanced topic?Link to article: http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/jvt002/Teaching/ASEE2008-Tranquillo-FinalPaper.pdf
The article also brought up valuable assessment/evaluation strategy ideas for kinesthetic learning. I was glad to see this, because I did have reservations about how to assess (either formally or informally) action strategies. They are less likely to produce a tangile product, like a written activity or objective test. One idea this author had was post-processing and why it is important. I added a quote about it below.
"Post-processing may take many forms including minute papers, out-of-class assignments
or class discussions. If a discussion is to be conducted, it is helpful to have an outline of
questions, prepared in advance, to keep the dialog moving forward. One simple question
is to ask for modifications to the activity that may have analogies to the concept. An
interesting variation is to split the class into groups. Each group develops their own
interpretation of the meaning of the activity, which they share and discuss with another
group."
No comments:
Post a Comment